In this article
The recent escalation involving Iran and the resulting disruption to global energy supply has reignited a familiar debate: are we heading back to a 1970s-style stagflationary environment?
At first glance, the sharp spike in oil prices and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz naturally draw comparisons to past energy crises such as the 1973 oil embargo or the Iranian Revolution. However, a more nuanced and arguably more relevant parallel may lie in the “Guns and Butter” era of the 1960s.
A Return to “Guns and Butter”?
The term “Guns and Butter” describes a period in the mid-1960s when governments simultaneously pursued expansive fiscal policies—funding both military commitments and domestic social programs. The outcome was predictable in hindsight: rising deficits, constrained productive capacity, and ultimately, an inflationary spiral.
Today, while the composition of spending differs, the structure is strikingly similar:
- Increased defence spending amid geopolitical tensions
- Continued fiscal stimulus through tax cuts and government programs
- A global backdrop of deglobalisation and supply constraints
This combination matters. When fiscal expansion occurs in an already resilient economy, it tends to amplify demand without a corresponding increase in supply, creating persistent inflationary pressure.
Why This Cycle Is Different
Unlike the disinflationary period from the 1990s to the 2010s, today’s environment is shaped by structural shifts:
1. Deglobalisation
Globalisation expanded supply chains, increased competition, and suppressed prices for decades. That dynamic is reversing:
- Trade fragmentation
- Supply chain reshoring
- Strategic resource control
The result is less efficiency and higher structural costs, pushing inflation higher over the long term.
2. Energy as a Supply Shock
The current conflict has triggered one of the largest supply disruptions on record, with peak losses exceeding 11% of global oil demand. Unlike past crises, the shock is broader:
- Crude oil
- Natural gas
- Refined fuels
- Fertiliser supply chains
This is not just an energy story. It is a global cost shock feeding directly into inflation.
3. Labour Constraints
In addition to goods, labour supply is tightening:
- Demographic pressures
- Migration restrictions
- Skill mismatches
This raises the risk of wage-price dynamics becoming entrenched, particularly if inflation expectations begin to drift.
Inflation: Not Temporary, but Structural
While central banks may prefer to “look through” energy shocks, the broader backdrop suggests inflation is becoming more persistent.
Recent projections highlight the risk:
- Base case: Global growth ~3.1%, inflation ~4.4%
- Adverse scenario: Growth ~2.5%, inflation ~5.4%
- Severe scenario: Growth ~2%, inflation >6%
This is not a transitory spike. It reflects a shift in the inflation regime.
Moreover, the traditional 2% inflation target may no longer be aligned with economic realities. A structurally higher range, potentially 3–4%, is increasingly plausible.
Market Implications: A Shift in Leadership
In this environment, market dynamics are also evolving.
1. Liquidity is no longer abundant
With inflation remaining elevated, central banks have limited flexibility to ease aggressively. Reduced liquidity tends to:
- Lower speculative excess
- Shift focus back to fundamentals
2. Valuation discipline returns
When uncertainty rises, investors reassess risk-reward more carefully:
- Paying 30x earnings for growth becomes harder to justify
- Comparable growth at lower valuations becomes more attractive
3. Income matters again
Dividend-paying equities are regaining relevance:
- Provide real cash flow in an inflationary environment
- Offer downside resilience
- Often trade at more reasonable valuations
This contrasts with the concentration seen in large-cap technology, where expectations remain elevated.
Positioning in a “Higher for Longer” World
From a portfolio construction perspective, several themes emerge:
Cash is no longer a drag.
In a higher-rate environment, cash offers:
- Positive real optionality
- Flexibility amid volatility
- Protection against valuation resets
Equities remain investable but selective
We are not bearish equities. However:
- Broad market exposure may underperform
- Active selection becomes critical
Diversification beyond the obvious
Investor focus has narrowed significantly in recent years. Yet opportunities exist across:
- Non-US markets
- Industrial and cyclical sectors
- Dividend and value-oriented strategies
Conclusion: From Shock to Regime Shift
The Iran conflict is not just a geopolitical event. It is a catalyst exposing deeper structural changes in the global economy.
The combination of:
- Fiscal expansion (“Guns and Butter”)
- Deglobalisation
- Energy supply shocks
- Labour constraints
points toward a world of structurally higher inflation and more complex policy trade-offs.
For investors, this is not a time for binary positioning. It is a time for:
- Discipline over speculation
- Income over narrative
- Diversification over concentration
The investment landscape is evolving and those who adapt to this new regime will be better positioned to preserve and grow capital over the long term.
Source: Morningstar, IMF & Reuters
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Data as of March 31, 2026
This article is general market commentary, not investment advice or a personal recommendation. The value of investments can fall as well as rise, and past performance is not a guide to future returns. Written and reviewed under our editorial standards.
Begin with a conversation about what your wealth is for.
Thirty minutes with an adviser who will ask about your family, your plans and the years ahead before anything else. No obligation.